[kaffe] Re: arm emulated by GXemul [1] (success with intrp)

[Kiyo Inaba]

Dalibor wrote:
>Thank you, Kiyo, that's great news, since currently the two tests can be
>expected to fail.

Yes, I understand that these two are expected to fail.

But, then, this report introduces me one interesting (or funny) fact.
Since I did not put any info for SIGNAL_ARGS for 'arm/netbsd1' (usually
this should be defined in 'md.h'), no proper care for exception handling
is done for this port. But, the regression test reports that exception
handling works OK (at least in StackDump.out).

Is it specific to arm based engine, or shall we have more regression
tests to check this lazyness?

Kiyo