[kaffe] Re: request for switching to subversion
Adam Heath
doogie at brainfood.com
Fri Jun 3 13:53:53 PDT 2005
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Jim Pick wrote:
> >>So now, I'm posting publically. What do all the existing developers
> >>think about switching?
>
> I'm all for switching, if it doesn't inconvenience anyone.
There are lots of places that currently access kaffe cvs directly. Notifying
all of those users is going to be a pain.
> Some people might have a whole bunch of changes in their working tree
> that haven't been checked in yet.
Not just that, but people who are using cvs may not be reading this list.
> > I'm fine with CVS and I'd really hate to install svn on all my strange
> > boxes. CVS is very proven and portable. Maybe it is possible to get CVS
> > in "read only" export? I don't even have commit access.
>
> That might be possible, I see a howto here:
>
> http://sam.zoy.org/writings/programming/svn2cvs.html
It's certainly possible to setup a readonly cvs copy of a read/write svn
repository. But unless we switch off cvs at some point, users who only do
readonly checkouts will never be inclined to switch.
> I've been using svn for my own personal repository of stuff for about 2
> years, and I've been quite happy with it.
>
> It would take some time to prototype this, but I'm willing to do the
> work. I think I'd like to set up a single-purpose Xen session on my new
> server to host it.
We have a xen setup already to go. 3 xen servers, large file server, gigabit
nfsroot. kaffe.brainfood.com is a 512m(ram), 40g setup running 2 tinderboxes
already.
> In particular, it would be nice to get rid of the cvs2ps-based email
> script I made, since that's pretty buggy and incomplete. :-)
/me whispers NIH. Always use someone else's work or script. There are plenty
of cvs/svn -> email notification scripts to choose from. We haven't used one
for svn, so does anyone have any suggestions?
More information about the kaffe
mailing list