[Java-gnome-developer] Re: [kaffe] Java-Gnome: jni or cni

[Per Bothner]

Chris Gray wrote:

> On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote:
>>The big question is: should we switch to CNI?
> 
> No.

Though I'm obviously in the CNI "camp", I tend to agree.

But I think the folloup-question is: should java-gnome
switch from JNI-only implementation to some kind of dual
JNI-or-CNI mechanism.  I.e. explore ways to reduce the
overhead of JNI when CNI is avaliable.  I suggested one
approach in my previous email (which may be waiting for
moderator approval on the kaffe and java-gnome lists).
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per at bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
java-gnome-developer mailing list
java-gnome-developer at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-developer