[kaffe] Re: moving config/superh to config/sh

[Dalibor Topic]

Kiyo Inaba wrote:

> By the way, aren't there anyone who volunteer to modify jit-xxx.def
> to be compatible with jit3-xxx.def? Originally these two files are
> very close, but when we remove some warning these two files (or
> precisely speaking pairs of these files) becomes much different.
> This make me so hard to check the behavior of jit3-m68k.def against
> jit-m68k.def...
> 
> # Or shall I do that? :-)

Thanks for the head start, I've fixed alpha, arm & sparc now. :)

cheers,
dalibor topic