[kaffe] Weak references/Class destruction
Guilhem Lavaux
guilhem at kaffe.org
Wed Dec 22 10:39:13 PST 2004
Helmer Krämer wrote:
>Guilhem Lavaux <guilhem at kaffe.org> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>>Here is a patch which changes the way the classes are destroyed and
>>implements
>>weak references for boehm-gc and kaffe-gc. This fixes class concurrent
>>destruction issues which was bugging boehm-gc (and maybe also kaffe-gc) and
>>should insure that we do not access already freed memory.
>>
>>
>
>If I remember it correctly, the problems with boehm-gc and
>garbage collecting classes are:
>
>a) Suppose class A is the only class implementing interface I. If
> A becomes unreachable, so does I. In this case however, there's
> no guarantee that C is destroyed before I. This means that destroyClass
> has to deal with the fact that I might already have been destroyed
> when C is destroyed. This gets complicated for the implementors
> table and the interface dispatch tables because destroyClass has
> to remove C from some of the structures stored inside I.
>
>b) Same thing when a class A and its super class A' become unreachable
> at the same time. In this case, some of the pointers stored in the
> vtable (and interface dispatch table) may no longer be valid because
> A' was already destroyed.
>
>The solution for a) is to use weak references.
>
>The solution for b) is to use allocation types that are automatically
>freed by the gc for everything that might be stored in a vtable (or
>interface dispatch table).
>
>Is this correct so far?
>
>
>
Completely right ! :)
Regards,
Guilhem Lavaux.
More information about the kaffe
mailing list