[kaffe] Re: LinkedList.subList severely broken
Dalibor Topic
robilad@yahoo.com
Wed May 21 10:34:01 2003
Salut Daniel,
--- Daniel Bonniot <Daniel.Bonniot@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> > LinkedListIterator(LinkedList list, int index) {
> > super(list, index);
> > elem = list.head;
> >+ // Position elem to the index'th element.
> >+ // We know that index is a valid index, because that was
> >+ // checked in the constructor in AbstractListIterator.
> >+ for (; index > 0; index--)
> >+ elem = elem.next;
> >
>
> Maybe it would be simpler and more robust (but a little bit less
> efficient?) to just have:
>
> super(list, index);
> elem = list.get(index);
>
> Which one is considered better?
simpler code is always better in my opinion. Easier to write, easier to
understand, easier to change.
> Should I send a changelog entry too?
that would be nice, thanks.
cheers,
dalibor topic
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com