[kaffe] Re: INTRP, JIT1 & JIT3 on m68k platform

[Gwenole Beauchesne]

On Tue, 6 May 2003, Tony Wyatt wrote:

> Interpreter:    0.065 Mflops/s, time taken 10.56 sec
> JIT (1):         0.618 Mflops/s, time taken 1.11 sec
> JIT (3):         0.457 Mflops/s, time taken 1.5 sec
> 
> So, I agree with you that JIT3 is slower then JIT1.

Do you conjecture that JIT3 is slower than JIT1 on platforms with a decent 
amount of registers to allocate to translated blocks? I am just wondering 
since I am still hesitating for the AMD64 JIT.

Bye,
Gwenole.