[kaffe] compiling for m68k with optimization works.
Timothy Stack
stack at cs.utah.edu
Fri Apr 25 08:43:01 PDT 2003
> > 2) Support how many versions of linux?
> > After just browsing source code of ifaddrs_linux.c, my feeling tells
> > me this software use some new features available in linux (netlink
> > and netpacket). If we really merge this when we use kaffe on linux,
> > we have to limit the supporting versions on linux. Am I right?
yes
> I see five options:
> a) Tell people to upgrade to latest glibc on linux (only ipv4)
We could have configure make the suggestion, but lets not require it.
> b) drop the replacement getifaddrs code (i.e. just use the dummy functions if
> getifaddrs is not found) (no ipv4 or ipv6 at all ;)
Nah, just update the test of when the replacement code is used, it
already works for plenty of systems at the moment.
> c) use USAGI for ipv6 capable getifaddrs (ipv4, ipv6)
This is the original source of the replacement code, although its probably
a bit out of date.
> d) improve the replacement function further until it works on older systems,
> too
> (ipv4, ipv6)
maybe
> e) use something to abstract from the networking layer, like GNet [2].
ugh, less dependencies please ;)
> According to the glibc 2.3.2 README it is supposed to run on 2.X versions of
> linux, on most processors (with a few 64 bit exceptions, that require a 2.4
> kernel).
>
> > Because, I just browse the source and some make messages, I have
> > no idea what is best when we don't have netlink or netpacket on
> > linux. Suggestions please.
>
> I hope Tim will have some better suggestions than mine. ;)
Lets just add "linux/netlink.h" (and others) to the AC_CHECK_HEADERS list
in the configure.in and add 'defined(HAVE_LINUX_NETLINK_H)' to the test in
replace/getifaddrs.c.
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
tim stack
More information about the kaffe
mailing list