[kaffe] AWT Toolkits

[Steph Meslin-Weber]

Hi Dalibor,

> Beside that Kaffe's awt implementation is not peer
> based. In fact most peer classes are missing. That is
> another point you should look at.

That's very true, I'd overlooked that - although I'm implementing all of them
in Java, so mine could conceivably be used over any native implementation of a
framebuffer (remote or otherwise).

> Should we consider it a bug in kaffe's AWT?

I'm not sure what to classify it as - certainly, the peer classes offer
flexibility and compatibility... But considering that things work well as-is,
how many other things would break if we were to go peer-based?

How much interest is there for this level of jdk-compatibility?

Kind regards,

Steph