JDK version ?
Brian Adkins
brian at lojic.com
Wed Mar 24 11:10:33 PST 1999
At 11:29 AM 3/24/99 -0700, Godmar Back wrote:
>>
>> It might be worthwhile to make whatever changes you need to be able to run
>> the Volano benchmark well:
>>
>> http://www.javaworld.com/jw-03-1999/jw-03-volanomark.html
>>
>
>I did that a while ago:
>
>Here's the numbers I got for the simple local loopback test:
>
>FreeBSD 3.1/JDK1.1.7: 410 m/s
>FreeBSD 3.1/Kaffe/jit/select: 700 m/s
>Linux/JDK1.1.7/intrp 808 m/s
>Linux/Kaffe/jit/select 840 m/s
>Linux/Kaffe/jit/poll 860 m/s
>Linux/JDK1.1.7/TYA1.2v4 1120 m/s
Ok, if I use your FreeBSD figure of 410 and normalize it to the 166 seen in
the URL above (because of different hardware), it looks like the
Linux/Kaffe/jit/poll would be about 348 versus Microsoft's 1412.
Actually, I'm more interested in the amount of concurrent connections Kaffe
can handle - that test separated the men from the boys.
I'm not trying to be critical for the heck of it here. I need to determine
viable platforms for my product, and performance is an important factor.
>All Linux results are under Debian 2.1. My RH 5.2 box is a bit slower
>(identical hardware, different kernel.) All results were obtained
>on a Dual PII/350.
>
>Volanomark doesn't run with native threads, so it's all green threads
>for Sun. It's all jthreads for Kaffe.
>
> - Godmar
More information about the kaffe
mailing list