more ltdl stuff and more

[Godmar Back]

 Oops, now I too got caught by the list's Reply-To: setting.
This mail was of course not supposed to go this list...

	- Godmar

> 
> 
>  Somewhat related to this mail, here's another wish I have:
> 
> Could we add a FAQ that briefly describes how your install tree should
> look after you type gmake install.  This way, people can compare file
> by file whether they have old libraries in their install tree.
> 
> I know that directory names and locations have changed: I remember
> targets such share/kaffe/i386-freebsd2 or lib/ or libexec or whatever.
> We (preferably you, Alexandre) need to document what a properly installed
> prefix tree looks like so that people can check their installation against
> what it ought to be before reporting problems.  Or if they report problems,
> we'll simply point them at the FAQ.
> Actually, a FAQ.LD_LIBRARY_PATH would be nice to have too.
> 
> Did the latest set of changes reintroduce the ability to load .so files yet?
> 
> 	- Godmar
> 
> > 
> > On Jan 15, 1999, Raffaele Sena <raff at aromatic.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Parmelan, Edouard wrote:
> > >> You should run make install before make check :(
> > >> 
> > > 	I did! I always do! 
> > 
> > Actually, this should no longer be needed, but it may still help if
> > you already have an older version of the library installed.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alexandre Oliva  http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva  aoliva@{acm.org}
> > oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
> > Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
> > 
> > 
> 
>