unsubscribe
Johan Uiterwijk Winkel
juw at dds.nl
Mon Feb 22 11:00:09 PST 1999
Godmar Back wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> I don't have a whole lot of time right now, but a couple of comments
> about your patches. First off, we do appreciate them.
>
> However, formatting changes make them awfully hard to evaluate.
> Would it be possible for you to submit a version that would only contain
> substantial changes, i.e., no formatting changes?
>
> Let me go over your list and tell you what I would like to see:
>
> >
> > * Runtime.runFinalizersOnExit(boolean) must be static
>
> Good.
>
> > * Serializable declarations and serialVersionUID definitions completed
>
> The declarations are fine, but it's not at all clear whether we need
> the serialVersionUIDs. See FAQ.Known-bugs. Tim recently fixed
> serialization, we need to research whether we still need the serialVersionUIDs
> or not and if so, where.
> I'm not saying we don't need them, I'm just saying it's unclear to me
> at this point.
>
> > * Integer.decode(String) threw NumberFormatException on pure "0" (zero)
> > * some uninstantiable classes missed the private constructor
>
> Good.
>
> > * do not observe String internals from classes other than StringBuffer
>
> Maybe, but probably good.
>
> > * wrong conversion value in Character.toTitleCase(char)
> > * some StringIndexOutOfBoundsException checks were missing
> > * some checkPropertiesAccess()s were missing from
>
> Good.
>
> > * the rest is heavy code optimization and clean-up
>
> I looked at the changes some, and I do not consider replacing if/else
> with the ? operator an optimization. In fact, the authors of the code
> made a conscious choice to avoid the ? operator. This is in part because
> ? is buggy in pizza, but more importantly, it's because the ? operator
> is hard to read and error-prone in general.
>
> This is not to say that part of kaffe's coding style is to not use the
> ? operator, which would be kind of silly since I said Kaffe doesn't have
> a coding style, but please only use it in your own, new code.
>
> >
> > one thing I was not really sure how to deal with:
unsubscribe
More information about the kaffe
mailing list