Alternative GCs for Kaffe ?

[Pontus Rydin]

No, I didn't, but I did not really look for performance improvements. The
main purpose of my work was to adapt kaffe to work with an already existing
software that was using Boehm GC.

I've been using Boehm GC quite a lot and I am very pleased with its
performance. 

> ----------
> From: 	dyoung@mork.uni.uiuc.edu[SMTP:dyoung@mork.uni.uiuc.edu]
> Reply To: 	kaffe@rufus.w3.org
> Sent: 	Sunday, July 19, 1998 8:13 AM
> To: 	kaffe@rufus.w3.org
> Subject: 	RE: Alternative GCs for Kaffe ?
> 
> 
> 	Did you observe any performance increase using the Boehm GC vs.
> the default Kaffe GC ?
> 
> On Jul 18, 16:54, Pontus Rydin wrote:
> } Subject: RE: Alternative GCs for Kaffe ?
> > I did some playing around with an early version of kaffe (0.56 or
> something)
> > Boehm GC (formerely known as PARC GC). Adapting that version of Kaffe to
> > Boehm GC was pretty straight forward, ...
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Young * dcy2 cornell edu
>